Instagram · Unknown creator · Unknown · Oct 16, 2026
The video mixes a real murder case and a real constitutional immunity rule with allegations that have not been established as fact.
Claim-by-claim breakdown
Unsupported (79% confidence): Ankita Bhandari was murdered after refusing to provide “special services” to a VIP. Official and news reporting confirm Ankita Bhandari was murdered and that allegations of a VIP angle led to calls for further investigation, but they do not prove the VIP/special-services motive.
Unsupported (72% confidence): The allegations about the VIP were being directed at Dushyant Gautam, who is a BJP member. Sources note that Dushyant Gautam is a BJP leader and that some opposition figures linked him to the alleged VIP angle, but this remains an allegation rather than a confirmed finding.
Accurate (86% confidence): The Chief Minister of Uttarakhand ordered a CBI probe into the case. Reporting says Uttarakhand’s chief minister recommended a CBI probe into the Ankita Bhandari case, and the agency later took it up.
Accurate (95% confidence): The Governor of a state in India has constitutional immunity from criminal proceedings during their term of office. Article 361 says the Governor is not answerable to any court for official acts, and no criminal proceedings shall be instituted or continued during the term.
False (90% confidence): A governor cannot be arrested, detained, or subjected to legal action until their tenure ends. Article 361 bars criminal proceedings during the term and shields official acts, but it does not say governors are wholly immune from every form of legal scrutiny or action.