Fabio Souza / Notícias e política on Instagram: "CANALHAS DO PL .
Janones denúncia que a bancada de Flávio Bolsonaro quer fazer o fim do 6x1 valer só a partir de 2038 .
COMPARTILHEM AO MÁXIMO
GOLPISTAS NÃO PASSARÃO
Sigam, curtam, comentem e compartilhem nosso conteúdo. Vamos fortalecer nossas páginas e manter nossa voz ativa nas redes!
🔴 @fdesouzaalves
🔴 @esquerda.atuante
🔴 @fronte.de.esquerda13
#Lula #Brasil #Democracia #ForçaLula #Lula2026"
Verdict: The video is based on a real amendment proposal, but it exaggerates who is responsible and glosses over the legislative context.
Instagram · Fabio Souza / Notícias e política · Unknown · Oct 13, 2026
The transcript refers to a real proposal to phase out the 6x1 work schedule over 12 years, but it frames it as a generic move by “bolsonaristas” and gives a noisy, inconsistent timeline.
Claim-by-claim breakdown
Accurate (89% confidence): A congressional amendment proposed phasing out the 6x1 work schedule only after a 12-year transition. Reporting on the amendment says it would reduce the weekly workday by one hour every three years, reaching the new limit after 12 years. That matches the core of the video's claim, though the clip does not name the author or explain the…
Misleading (72% confidence): The amendment was presented by 'bolsonaristas' or Flávio Bolsonaro's camp. The available source identifies the author as Júlia Zanatta, not Flávio Bolsonaro. It is fair to say the proposal came from a Bolsonaro-aligned deputy, but not to present that as proof that Flávio Bolsonaro personally or exclusively led it.
Accurate (77% confidence): The proposal would delay the end of the 6x1 schedule until 2038. The amendment was described as a 12-year transition. A 12-year phase-in from a 2026 proposal would indeed point to 2038, but the exact year depends on when the transition is counted from and how the proposal is enacted.
False (96% confidence): The transcript consistently says the measure would start in 2038. Near the beginning the speaker says '2038', but the final line says '2033'. That makes the video internally inconsistent on the year.