RAFAEL LOPES on Instagram: "FIM DA DESGRAÇA DAS BETS! Bora Lula! Temer liberou, Bolsonaro deixou e Lula acabou com as BETS. @lulaoficial"
Verdict: The video mixes real points about regulation with a false claim that Lula ended betting in Brazil.
Credibility score: 43/100 · 6 claims checked · 4 accurate, 0 misleading, 1 false, 1 unsupported.
Instagram · Unknown creator · Unknown · Sep 27, 2026
It is right that betting was legalized in 2018 and later regulated under Lula, but the claim that Lula “ended” bets is false.
Claim-by-claim breakdown
- Accurate (96% confidence): Brazil legalized fixed-odds sports betting in 2018 under Michel Temer. Planalto’s text of Law 13.756/2018 states that the fixed-odds lottery/betting modality was instituted in 2018.
- Accurate (72% confidence): The Bolsonaro government left betting largely without detailed regulation and supervision until 2022. The 2018 law legalized the modality, while later official materials say the sector needed further regulation and that authorization/regulation only came later.
- Accurate (97% confidence): Lula’s government regulated fixed-odds betting in 2023. Official government sources and the Planalto text of Law 14.790/2023 confirm the 2023 regulation.
- False (98% confidence): Lula signed a measure that ended bets in Brazil. Law 14.790/2023 regulates fixed-odds betting; official materials describe authorization, supervision, and taxation, not a ban.
- Accurate (95% confidence): A Brazilian provisional measure lasts 60 days and can be extended once for another 60 days if Congress does not vote. Brazil’s Constitution provides for a 60-day validity period, extendable once for another 60 days.
- Unsupported (55% confidence): Bets have already taken more than R$62 billion from Brazilian people. I found later studies reporting figures around R$62.5 billion for 2025, but the transcript does not identify the period or methodology.
More fact-checks
- 11K views · 9.8K reactions | Remember how she died! Running from the so called “ paparazzi” | Ameer Moore — Score 12/100
- რადიო თავისუფლება on Instagram: "⭕️ "ნიჰილისტ მცირეწლოვანთა კლანი", "მანიაკ მკვლელთა კულტი", „არცერთი სიცოცხლე არ არის მნიშვნელოვანი“ და სხვა საშიში, საერთაშორისო დაჯგუფებების კვალი თბილისის ქუჩებსა და ონლაინქსელებში - რა აღმოვაჩინეთ და რა უნდა იცოდეთ? რას წარმოადგენს ეს დაჯგუფებები და როგორ იბირებენ ბავშვებს? როგორ ებრძვიან მათ მსოფლიოში და რა იციან მსგავს ჯგუფებსა და საფრთხეებზე საქართველოში სამართალდამცველებმა? 🔗 წაიკითხე ვრცლად BIO-ში, ბმულზე ან რადიო თავისუფლების ვებსაიტზე 👇" — Score 74/100
- SimplifieD on Instagram: "Are we lenient towards Americans ? Because a Delhi Court Has Allowed Foreigners in Myanmar Case One-Month Family Travel The seven foreigners, arrested in March 2026 for allegedly entering India on tourist visas, slipping into Myanmar without permits, and training ethnic groups in drone warfare at Camp Victoria, received default bail when the NIA’s September chargesheet stuck to immigration violations under the Immigration and Foreigners Act The NIA court in Delhi released their passports and modified bail terms, letting them travel to the US and Ukraine to see relatives, provided they share foreign addresses, contacts, and return to India after 30 days While the broader probe into possible terror links continues, some people have questioned if they come back and whether India was used as an arms route" — Score 58/100
- Gadadhar Bairagya on Instagram: "Jantar Mantar Protest Sparks Political Debate 🔥👇 The protest at Delhi's Jantar Mantar has once again brought national politics into the spotlight. Critics allege that the campaign led by CJP has received backing from leaders associated with several opposition parties, with many participants accusing the central government and calling for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's resignation. Supporters of the government, however, argue that opposition parties should first address governance challenges in the states they rule. They point to reports of police action against protesting students in Kerala, including the use of water cannons, and allegations of police lathi-charge on protesting employees in Punjab. According to these critics, parties struggling with law-and-order and public grievances in their own states should focus on those issues before claiming to "save India." The protest also drew attention because activist Sonam Wangchuk had been on a hunger strike. Some government supporters allege that activist Abhijeet Dipke attempted to use Wangchuk's protest to advance a broader political narrative. Those allegations are disputed, and different political groups have offered conflicting interpretations of the events. The developments have triggered intense debate across social media, with supporters and opponents presenting sharply different views. The controversy has quickly become one of the most discussed political topics online, as people continue to debate governance, accountability, and the role of political activism in India. What do you think? Can parties facing criticism over governance in their own states effectively present themselves as an alternative at the national level? #delhi #jantarmantar #cjp #abhijeetdipke #sonamwangchuk" — Score 56/100
- #shorts Magic Johnson refused to leave all his property to his son #celebrity #nba #magicjohson — Score 5/100
- Clipping content with Everygen AI — Score 38/100
- Crypto airdrop/points earnings claim — Score 38/100
- Claims about Muhammad in Hindu scriptures — Score 24/100