The video mixes a real political alignment on ending the 6x1 work schedule with broad claims about economic harm and business support that are not fully substantiated.
Claim-by-claim breakdown
Accurate (92% confidence): Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro both support ending the 6x1 work schedule. BBC and Folha reported that Lula backs ending the 6x1 scale and that Flávio Bolsonaro said he would vote for it.
Accurate (74% confidence): Flávio Bolsonaro had opposed the 6x1 proposal before saying he would support it. News coverage described Flávio as having previously delayed or resisted the measure before later signaling support.
Misleading (67% confidence): Ending the 6x1 schedule will cause job losses, business closures, and less formal employment. FGV Ibre and CNI analyses project increased costs and possible output or employment effects, but other reporting notes studies diverge and the final impact is uncertain.
Unsupported (48% confidence): The business sector broadly supported Flávio Bolsonaro. There is evidence of some business-sector concern about the 6x1 proposal, but not enough to verify that those sectors widely supported Flávio Bolsonaro as a whole.
Accurate (90% confidence): Nikolas Ferreira voted in favor of ending the 6x1 scale. Coverage of the vote reported that Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG) voted for the PEC ending the 6x1 scale.
Accurate (63% confidence): A reduction in working hours is risky in a country with low productivity relative to its rivals. Economic coverage and studies note concerns about competitiveness, costs, and productivity, but the policy’s full effects remain debated.